17 campaigns across multiple industries
Approach: Scraped LinkedIn Ads with Apify, then qualified which of those companies were B2B.
Why it worked: A personalized first line referencing their actual LinkedIn ad activity made the outreach hyper-relevant.
Approach: Scraped the Slicelife and Toasttab restaurant directories, then used Prospeo to find the emails associated with each domain and reverse prompts to find job titles.
Why it worked: Restaurant prospects are rarely found on LinkedIn or Apollo, and these inboxes are barely touched by cold email, so the people behind them are far more open to it.
Approach: Scraped law firms with Serper, split them into three segments with three different messaging angles, and scraped their actual Google reviews with Apify.
Why it worked: Each of the three segments (under 80 reviews, one to two bad reviews, and 100+ reviews) had a completely different pain point, so each one got completely different messaging.
Approach: Scraped hotels from Apollo, directories, and Google Maps using SerpAPI, then referenced their OTA listings.
Why it worked: The emails referenced their OTA listings (Booking.com and the like) and offered to reduce their commission dependency through direct WhatsApp bookings.
Approach: Scraped software companies offering free trials from Product Hunt, GetLatka, GetApp, Toolify, and SourceForge, then used Pandamatch and Similarweb for traffic data.
Why it worked: An AI prompt checked whether they actually offer a free trial, and companies with free trials want to convert those users into paying customers.
Approach: Scraped software directories such as Crunchbase, Product Hunt, GetLatka, GetApp, Toolify, and SourceForge, then ran AI prompts to check for free trial offerings.
Why it worked: It targeted companies with a specific headcount in their phone and customer support departments, combined with heavy website traffic.
Approach: Targeted companies running multiple domains (burner domains), which indicates active cold email operations, and used Pandamatch to detect those burner domains.
Why it worked: Burner domains forwarding to a main domain are a clear signal that a company is running outbound and needs better data.
Approach: Scraped Google Maps for wellness centers (yoga, Pilates, sauna, cold plunge, and ice bath), and also scraped the Apple App Store for wellness apps with bad reviews.
Why it worked: For studios, the emails referenced their strong community, measured by review count. For apps, they referenced actual 1-star reviews as the pain point.
Approach: Used Store Leads and Similarweb to find the top 10 keywords driving their organic traffic, along with their competitors, then enriched with Claygent to find branded keywords.
Why it worked: Each email named the specific competitor ranking above them for their target keywords, showing them exactly who is beating them.
Approach: Used DiscoLike, Clay's lookalike search, and SerpAPI Google Properties to find STRs and vacation rentals, then maximized contact points across personal, work, and generic emails.
Why it worked: It was a hard-to-scrape list reached through the maximum number of contact points, and each email mentioned the specific property locations they manage.
Approach: Used Serper to scrape local businesses, targeting specific business types in specific locations.
Why it worked: The emails mentioned having buyers ready for their specific business type in their location, so combining local and vertical targeting made every message highly relevant.
Approach: Targeted people who follow competitors such as Artisan on LinkedIn, using competitor follower lists as an intent signal for interest in outbound.
Why it worked: Following a competitor on LinkedIn is a strong intent signal, so these prospects are already actively interested in outbound solutions.
Approach: Used AI to filter a large list down to only the right service providers in the ICP locations.
Why it worked: The emails mentioned having buyers ready for their type of business in their location, and the AI-based filtering ensured high relevance.
Approach: Launched four parallel angles, each tackling a pain point: LLM Reality Check, New in Role plus LLM Search Results, Competitors Showing in AI Results, and Traffic Trend Decline.
Why it worked: It poked at the pain point at a timely moment. AI search disruption is a hot topic, and multiple angles were tested simultaneously.
Approach: Launched three angles with AI-personalized lines, targeting restaurants sourced from directories and Google Maps.
Why it worked: AI created the personalized lines at scale, and multiple variants were tested simultaneously to find the winning messaging.
Approach: Launched three campaigns (Competitor Comparison, Perception Check, and Billboard: Why It Matters) targeting companies whose AI brand perception may be costing them deals.
Why it worked: The messaging around how AI perceives brands was timely, the YC-backed founder angle added credibility, and it cited specific case studies such as Reducto (an 11x increase in AI citations).
Approach: Used county recorder data to find everyone who took a loan from a competitor in the last year, enriched the borrowing entity into a real decision-maker, and emailed a verifiable fact about their own deal followed by a same-day quote offer. Run as four iterations of the competitor targeting campaign.
Why it worked: Every email opened with a public record the prospect could verify about their own deal, so it read as research instead of a pitch, and the same-day quote gave an immediate reason to reply. Across 468K emails sent, it produced 384 positive replies, which were 15-20% of all replies.